About Discrepancies In The Rock Paintings Of Tassili N'ajjer Between Taken Paintings Statements And Originals

Main Article Content

Louiza Belkhiri
Hassiba Safrioun

Abstract

Through this topic, the two researchers are trying to draw the attention of the elite interested in Tassilian rock art as well as students, to a group of scientific errors, which is group of contemporary researchers they do not belong to the colonial stage, fell  into it, as their books are now considered references to which we return.


These are errors mainly related to changing the name of the original site of the rock scene, meaning that the same scene is attributed to a different site every time, or that one scene is broken up into several scenes, each of which is in turn attributed to a different site.


We also sometimes find archaeological taken paintings statements that are incomplete in comparison with the original scenes or do not match them completely.


Or the same researcher will change the name of the site to which the scene is attributed from one author to another.


Through this topic, we are not questioning the credibility of these researchers or their scientific abilities, but rather we are only trying to remove the confusion about these paradoxes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Louiza Belkhiri, & Hassiba Safrioun. (2024). About Discrepancies In The Rock Paintings Of Tassili N’ajjer Between Taken Paintings Statements And Originals. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 30(7), 287–296. https://doi.org/10.53555/kuey.v30i7.6658
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Louiza Belkhiri

Institut of Archéologie, University Alger 2 (Algeria). 

Hassiba Safrioun

 Institut d’Archéologie, Université Alger 2 (Algeria).