Comparative Effectiveness Of Equilibrium Exercises Versus Pegboard Exercises In Improving Upper Limb Coordination And Manual Dexterity Among Autistic Children Aged 7 To 15 Years
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) often results in motor coordination deficits, including impaired upper limb coordination and manual dexterity. Equilibrium exercises and pegboard exercises are commonly used interventions aimed at improving these motor functions. However, limited evidence exists comparing their effectiveness in autistic children.
Objective: To compare the effectiveness of equilibrium exercises versus pegboard exercises in improving upper limb coordination and manual dexterity among autistic children aged 7 to 15 years.
Methodology: A randomized controlled trial was conducted involving 40 autistic children aged 7 to 15 years. Participants were randomly divided into two groups: Group A (equilibrium exercises) and Group B (pegboard exercises). Both interventions were administered for 8 weeks, 5 sessions per week, each lasting 45 minutes. Outcome measures included the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency (BOT-2) for upper limb coordination and the Purdue Pegboard Test for manual dexterity. Assessments were performed at baseline and post-intervention.
Results: Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in upper limb coordination and manual dexterity (p<0.05). However, Group A (equilibrium exercises) showed greater improvement in BOT-2 scores, while Group B (pegboard exercises) exhibited superior gains in Purdue Pegboard Test scores. Statistical analysis revealed a significant difference between the groups, indicating the specific effectiveness of each intervention.
Conclusion: Equilibrium exercises are more effective in enhancing upper limb coordination, while pegboard exercises better improve manual dexterity in autistic children. Tailoring interventions based on individual needs can optimize motor skill development in this population.