Kashmir Conundrum and the Way Ahead

Abstract

The Kashmir problem must be examined through two lenses: Conflict Prevention and Peace Establishment. Following the abrogation of Article 370, the Indian state has implemented measures such as preventive arrest, curfews, and internet blockades to avert potential bloodshed. These temporary measures were essential for preventing violence and upholding law and order.  To avert violence, we have implemented an exclusionary policy of refraining from interaction with the natives. Ultimately, the Indian government must devise inclusive policies to engage with the populace, garner their trust, and achieve peace. To avert violence and ensure the maintenance of peace, a transition from public investment in prisons, law enforcement, and punitive measures is necessary. Kashmir is a traumatized society that requires therapeutic intervention to facilitate individual reconciliation and restore their humanity.  This article seeks to depart from conventional diplomatic rhetoric regarding Kashmir and examine the community-focused concept of enduring peace. This study will examine the potential for converting Kashmir from a region of conflict to one of peace. The article discusses the contributions of James Gilligan on Preventing Violence, Johan Galtung's concept of Reconciliation, and John Paul Lederach's notion of Sustainable Peace.